Sound Before Meaning

Most word-finding tools are meaning-first. Poets often work the other way — the music of the line constrains the vocabulary before sense does.

Ask a poet how they wrote the line and you will often get an answer that has nothing to do with what the line means. I needed a long vowel here. The s carried over from the line before. It had to end on a hard stop. The sense of the line — what it says — was a problem solved after the music was solved, not before.

This is the part of writing poetry that the prose writer often misses, and that the entire commercial dictionary of writing tools is built to misunderstand. The thesaurus assumes you have a meaning and want a word for it. The poet, frequently, has a sound and wants a word that fits.

The sound comes first

Hopkins did not arrive at dapple-dawn-drawn falcon by searching for falcon synonyms. He arrived at it because the d's were already in the line — they had been there since dappled in the previous stanza — and the falcon needed words that could carry the chain forward. The bird itself, the meaning, was a constraint roughly as important as the alliteration; possibly less.

Heaney, working on a bog poem, would not have written The peat held him if the line he needed was The bog kept him whole. Both sentences are true. Both name the same fact. The second has the round o that the poem wants and the first does not. The choice is made on sound, and the sound delivers the meaning more completely than the literal denotation could.

Elizabeth Bishop, in One Art, locks herself into a villanelle whose rhyme word is master. Every third line for nineteen lines must end in a word that rhymes with master. Faster, last, or, vaster, gesture, disaster. The poem's emotional climb is built on the diminishing distance between the perfect rhymes and the slant rhymes — and the whole architecture depends on a phonetic constraint imposed in the first stanza. The meaning of the poem assembled itself inside the sound.

The poet, frequently, has a sound and wants a word that fits.

The sounds the poet actually searches for

"Rhyme" is the part of phonetic word choice that gets taught in school, and it is the smallest part. A working poet — and a working lyricist, and any prose writer with a strong ear — searches for at least four kinds of sonic neighbor.

Perfect rhyme. The thing the rhyming dictionary gives you. Cat / hat. The stressed vowel and everything after it match. Useful in comic verse and traditional forms; mostly avoided in contemporary literary poetry because it lands too hard.

Slant rhyme. The stressed vowel matches but the consonants do not, or the consonants match but the vowels do not. Worm / swarm. Bone / moon. Dust / last. This is what most modern poets actually use. It carries the satisfaction of rhyme without the predictability. The rhyming dictionary handles this badly.

Assonance. A repeated vowel sound inside the line, regardless of the consonants around it. The long brown lawn. The aw repeats; the consonants do whatever they like. Assonance is the engine under most lines you remember without meaning to. No commercial dictionary lets you search for it.

Alliteration. A repeated initial consonant, the oldest tool in the English poetic kit — older than rhyme, older than meter. Wild and willful waters. Alliteration is what gave Old English verse its drive, and it is what gives a modern line its momentum when it is doing that work. A poet starting a line with w often needs a second w word in the next phrase, and the semantic thesaurus is no help at all.

Consonance. The cousin of alliteration. Repeated consonants, but not necessarily at the start of the word. The black truck stopped. The hard k's pile up; the line stops where the consonant says it should. Prose writers use this more than they realise.

What a phonetic word-finder actually looks like

A word-finder built for sound-first writers would do something the rhyming dictionary does not. It would, given a word, return not just the words that perfectly rhyme with it but the words that share its vowel, its initial consonant, its consonant cluster, its syllable count, its stress pattern — each as a separate small list.

For grief: brief, belief, reef, sheaf, relief. The perfect rhymes. Then: grieve, green, greet — words sharing the initial consonant cluster. Then leaf, chief, thief — slant rhymes, the same vowel but different consonants. Then creep, sleep, deep — different vowel, related consonant. Then pain, fade, ache — one-syllable words at the same lexical weight, useful when the poem needs a different sound but the same weight.

These are not synonyms. They are sonic neighbors. A poet drafting a line that ends in grief can scan the whole phonetic neighborhood and choose the word that works with the line above it, the line below it, the consonant pattern of the stanza. The meaning is one constraint among several; sometimes it is not even the controlling one.

The prose writer's secret

Sound-first writing is not only for poets. The prose writer who reads their work aloud — and every good prose writer does — is performing the same kind of search, just less consciously. The sentence is too soft. The two hard k's came too close together. The end of the line trails off. These are sonic judgements about a sentence, and the revision is a phonetic substitution, not a semantic one.

Hemingway's prose lands hard because the words are short and the consonants are mostly stops. McCarthy's prose rolls because the long vowels carry across the commas. Toni Morrison's sentences slow down where the assonance gathers and quicken where it doesn't. None of these effects is in the meaning of the words. All of them are in the sound.

A prose writer who has never thought about phonetics is still doing phonetics. They are doing it by ear, badly, and only at the moments when their ear notices something is wrong. A prose writer with access to the phonetic neighborhood of any word in their draft is doing it by ear and on purpose, and the difference is the difference between a sentence that scans and a sentence that does not.

The line was always there

There is a particular small mystery at the end of a finished poem, or a finished paragraph that came out right. The writer looks at it and cannot quite remember how they got there. The word at the end of the line is the right word, and a hundred wrong words were rejected on the way, and the process by which the rejection happened is mostly invisible even to the writer who did it.

What was happening, almost always, was a search over more than one neighborhood at once. Meaning was one of them. Sound was another. The line was found at the intersection. A tool that lets the writer search the sound directly — not as a poor synonym for searching meaning, but as its own kind of search — is the difference between a poet at a desk with a rhyming dictionary and a poet at a desk with the neighborhood open beside them.

The line was always there. It was the word that took some finding.

Wurding shows the phonetic neighborhood of any word — rhymes, slant rhymes, assonance, alliteration — as a first-class axis, beside meaning, complexity, kind, and feeling. See how it works.

← back to the journal